Were it not that I know well Alex, his critical ability and, above all, its provocative verve my blood boil and I am nervous pulse of the vein of the forehead. I would think: "but what the hell, even among our bait there are those who work (excellent in its effectiveness) of the exhaust collective fears about the dangers (only partly true, mostly imaginary) from which the electorate feels besieged winning? ". But fortunately I know that Sandra is a beautiful and good challenge and I welcome that because it opens an interesting debate. To it, therefore, I say.
answer referring to read a very interesting article yesterday in the journal Micromega signed by Rodotà and that is called "cultural inferiority". Rodotà an analysis of the League and the mainstream culture today, and speaks of a "separatist culture, not so much risky for 'national unity, as for social cohesion. Hence the practice of political representation as opposed to another - another that includes the immigrant, the South, the communist. From there an idea Community closed and aggressive. "Here, I add, the evenings spent in front of strips lobotomized sky and the perception of an unsafe Pieve di Cento. Continue Rodotà also critical to the Democratic Party, saying the policy agenda today is driven by approximation degrades cultural autonomy of the proceedings and the possibility of critical reflection. Back in 1994, in front of Berlusconi's success, there was a race to political marketing, because then it seemed that the political resolve in this innovaizone. At the time, mimed Berlusca, today is likely to mimic the League. behold, I hear from many sides: "They have caught the real problems people have won for that, we must also we be able to give concrete answers to people's problems. "Rodotà defines this attitude as a cultural inferiority, the mother of all defeats. And I feel very much agree with him. This does not deny the fact that the League and Berlusca have caught the real issues (immigration, impoverishment of families, insecurity). Only that, as written elsewhere, the sociologist A. Dal Lago, stuffed them into a "blob" single and undifferentiated. The problem of immigration and insecurity are certainly addressed, but I can not believe that the only languages \u200b\u200band the only possible recipes are those of the League. I think Veltroni during the election campaign had laid good foundations for our own speech, which proceeded on the recognition individual rights, social cohesion, development as the basis for everything, especially in Europe as a reference point.
Speaking of Europe, two comments
a) all the key documents that the European Union produce as guidelines for Member States (directives, programs, etc.) go in the opposite direction to that which bends in Italy takes on issues as security and immigration. Even the EU has understood nothing?
b) the press of other countries of Europe has a review of our current government and, above all of our electorate, very bad. Just read some magazine article on the International. The snooty condemned by many leftist intellectuals, therefore, affects all the European left? that is, is it an epidemic? or perhaps we should be careful not groped with some voters a trading downward too much?
I conclude my ramblings.
- I do not like the policy definition of "popular". It seems to me more than an imitation of the populist Berluscaz. I agree (with Alex we talked about it during a coffee) on the need for a program that touches so incisively those issues that concern the citizens, but to address them from our point of view. If people want more police because they feel insecure, but insecurity is not due to an increase in crime (for example, is the case of Pieve) patrols in place via Risorgimento Piazza Andrea Costa and cameras in what will solve? immediate cittradinanza certainly can say "here, have finally done something." But the problem of insecurity is not resolved, if upstream is the cause of different origin. In fact, the wrong answers are likely to aggravate the problem. Staying on this simple example (because it is significant how often you hear people say), seeing the increase patrols around the feeling that something is wrong, if there's the police. So attention to the answers that are given to the alleged problems of the people. Careful to distinguish in the single, undifferentiated blob.
- With partecipaizone not know about you but I do not want to finish anything. On a German newspaper a journalist said that Berlusconi won Italy because Italians do not want to take the right and duty to participate, and then lazily delegate who seems able to govern alone, without resorting to the demos, the people. Well, I still want to take this responsibility and I think it is important to encourage others to do the same.
Laura
0 comments:
Post a Comment