Court of Salerno - Civil Section I - December 14, 2010 order
A recent order of the Court of Salerno provided for the suspension of the resolution of a ' condominium meeting, specifying who is not competent to act on the majority 'installation of a video surveillance system of the common parts of the building, even if this results in greater security for all buildings. In a landscape of absolute legal vacuum in this area, this measure represents a significant precedent that may well reasoned influence future similar legal decisions. The story, born to a request from a condominium to invalidate the resolutions relating to the installation of these devices, it should be resolved by proper application of the general principles that govern the "separate worlds" of personal data protection and condominium buildings. The Court of Salerno focuses on the difference between the owner of the data (blocks) and the body that makes decisions on matters that could affect the personal data of individual members. In other words, the assembly of the building can not successfully pursue a typical security purposes the data controller that will install a video surveillance system, or "the protection of persons and property against possible aggression, theft, robbery, damage, vandalism, or purpose of fire prevention or safety in the workplace." The Judicial Authority repenting of the illegality of the details this decision because these goals are beyond the protection duties of the meeting. Ultimately, the resolution by which you decide to install a video surveillance system must be unanimous.
Text property is taken from www.secsolution.com
Source: www.condominioweb.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment